Messagewright Chemicals policy communications consultancy 2012-11-15T13:34:18Z http://www.messagewright.co.uk/feed/atom/ WordPress Paul <![CDATA[How do you end up hiring people who have no ideas?]]> http://www.messagewright.co.uk/?p=622 2011-10-28T13:12:26Z 2011-10-28T13:12:26Z Dilbert.com

]]>
0
Paul <![CDATA[There’s more to EDC potency than simple affinity]]> http://www.messagewright.co.uk/?p=617 2011-10-28T13:08:04Z 2011-10-28T13:06:52Z Paul’s latest article for H&E, the website he edits for the Cancer Prevention and Education Society. Read it here.

In the previous issue of H&E, we presented evidence that receptors on the outside of cells (membrane receptors) are much more receptive to some man-made molecules than the better-studied nuclear receptors. In this case the sceptical conclusion is false, even if the significance of the consequences is not yet clear.

In this post, we will see why the swamping argument is unsound, even in cases where an EDC has a much lower affinity for a receptor than does a natural hormone, and examine why this means standard toxicological testing protocols are worthless for assessing harm from ED effects. Go to article.

]]>
0
Paul <![CDATA[Neither will work but option 2 is cheaper]]> http://www.messagewright.co.uk/?p=609 2011-08-03T14:41:01Z 2011-08-03T14:38:54Z Dilbert.com

]]>
0
Paul <![CDATA[test 1]]> http://localhost/wordpress1/?p=215 2011-06-27T09:47:21Z 2011-06-19T14:42:44Z Are feeling tested yet?

]]>
0
Paul <![CDATA[test 2]]> http://localhost/wordpress1/?p=213 2011-06-27T09:47:34Z 2011-06-19T14:40:20Z doink!

]]>
0
Paul <![CDATA[test 3]]> http://localhost/wordpress1/?p=140 2011-06-27T09:47:50Z 2011-06-01T20:41:47Z Are these two jokers playing at?

]]>
0
Paul <![CDATA[test 4]]> http://localhost/wordpress1/?p=27 2011-06-27T09:48:08Z 2011-04-13T22:25:50Z

]]>
0
Paul <![CDATA[test 5]]> http://localhost/wordpress1/?p=4 2011-06-27T09:48:32Z 2011-04-11T21:26:55Z i’m feeling smug.

]]>
0